The 5 Creepiest Advertising Techniques of the (Near) Future | Cracked.com
This is a must read - funny, scary and inspiring at the same time: The 5 Creepiest Advertising Techniques of the (Near) Future | Cracked.com.
« May 2008 | Main | July 2008 »
This is a must read - funny, scary and inspiring at the same time: The 5 Creepiest Advertising Techniques of the (Near) Future | Cracked.com.
Trendwatching just released a hot new report here. Some excerpts and comments:
According to Trendwatching, the rise of FREE LOVE can be attributed to:
I highly recommend reading Trendwatching's five manifestations of FREE LOVE: 'Any excuse to advertise', 'Courting saturated consumers', 'C2C', 'Swapping, not spending', and 'Less is more', which all incorporate one or more of the above drivers.
Joichi Ito and the Ars Electronica people have invited me to join them for this conference that is promising to be very unique. I will be giving a talk on September 5, 2008 - join me if you are somewhere close by (this event is held in Linz, Austria). This is what Joi says about it:
"Computers and the Internet has lowered
the cost of communication and the creation and distribution of
information so much that many fundamental notions of organizations,
economics and property have completely changed or require major
upgrades. There is a new generation of youth across the globe which
lead the charge into this changing world, modifying their basic
behaviors to adapt to technology as it develops. Some businesses and
artists have been able to keep up with these trends while other
struggle and fail. The much slower to adapt legal system is being
pushed to its limits with organizations on all sides of the issues
trying very hard to adapt outdated laws. Most of the new behaviors and
organizations creating value have a completely different notion
property. Intellectual property, while key to the post-industrial
revolution nature of the firm, is more of an encumbrance than an asset
to the sharing oriented mode of creation now central to the Internet.
This year, we will bring together the users, artists, businesses,
policy makers and academics involved intentionally or beyond their
control in this change to understand this new world and to try to adapt
to it."
(Joichi Ito)
This is a presentation I have it late 2007 but it is still very much to-the-point and relevant. Slideshare.net rocks, btw - it's really the Youtube of Slideshows. You can check out all of my slideshows on Slideshare, here (pdf downloads for all of them).
Well, this is of course hardly new, as such, just more pronounced. The Future of Advertising will see advertisers (and brands, directly) providing free music, films, TV-shows, games and other premium content in return for targeted and focused attention to what was formerly known as Ads; or rather other types of content - as I sometimes call it, advercontent or contvertising - that promotes products and services - but limited to what we have ASK to see.
This
means I will be trading some of my personal user data, my click-streams and digital breadcrumbs in
return for getting free content. Think ad-supported music (yes... soon!) and films. This will feel
like free to the users and will offer huge value to the advertisers
(provided of course that the match is 99%!)
Read more here: www.mediafuturist.com/advertising/index.html If you like my images check out my other stuff on Flickr.
Update: Just ran across this very much related cartoon on Flickr
Web 1.0 was about GETTING Noise. Web 2.0 is (was) about MAKING Noise. Web 3.0 is about FILTERING Noise. Web 4.0 (ouch) is about SMART NOISE (or... going deaf?).... watch this and tell me what you think
Download all GerdTube videos via this iTunes Link
Is it ALL about maximizing your profit and retaining control over the market? Is the short-tern view towards immediate profit sustainable in the long-term? In this networked and hyper-connected word, if you can have and maintain complete control is it still okay and 'natural' to do so and do exploit the advantage to the fullest? Here is a quote from Russian President Dmitry Medvedev: "economic egoism'' has led to what may be the worst
economic contraction since the depression of the 1930s"
Maybe this video, below, can illustrate the point a bit?
Here is his bottom line from the Washington Post Interviews
" There will be no media consumption left in 10 years that is not
delivered over an IP network. There will be no newspapers, no magazines
that are delivered in paper form. Everything gets delivered in an
electronic form..."
I found this very interesting chart on Shopping Innovations on KenRadio.com (I think). Imagine shopping via / on your favorite social network, people i.e. users collaborating to produce new products... and holographic sales assistants.
Speaking of holography, yes... it's real.Check out this video, below (Cisco):
After I held a presentation on this subject, a few days ago, I decided I may as well make a short video out of the slides, so here it is. I am using Screenflow for this - a fantastic way of integrating video into a slideshow while you are clicking through, and record the whole thing.
In this video I talk about the Future of Copyright and these juicy subjects:
Update: here is an iPod-ready file for downloading: Download copyright_2.0 by Gerd Leonhard Futurist short.m4v
Update: just found an interesting podcast show on Copyright2.0 here
You can, btw, subscribe to my Gerdtube video blog posts via my Blip.tv channel here (includes itunes feed etc - Blip rocks!).
Via Twitter and Buzzfeed comes this nice remix: "As part of Stephen Colbert’s “Make McCain Exciting”
contest, one YouTube user has masterfully mashed-up sound bytes and
close-ups of McCain with Madonna’s “Vogue,” making the presidential
nominee not only exciting but...."
"...the MPAA,...told Judge Davis that peer-to-peer users automatically should be liable for infringement. The only purpose for placing copyrighted works in the shared folder is, of course, to 'share,' by making those works available to countless other P2P networks," the MPAA wrote."
And more from the Wired blog: "You don't have to prove actual distribution. You need to prove there's works in the share folder, and that is distribution," said Joseph Geisman, MPAA's chief intellectual property attorney, as he described the so-called "making available" concept"
War is peace and peace is war. Right?